What happened
A retrospective STEMS report published on 22 July 2026 follows 11 of the 12 original NCT03269071 recipients for a median 5.7 years after one injection of human fetal neural precursor cells into spinal fluid. Serious adverse events occurred but were judged unlikely related to the transplant. Median disability score EDSS rose from 7.25 before transplantation to 7.75 at two years and 8.5 at long-term follow-up. Median score on the cognition test SDMT was 38 at baseline, 49 at two years and 42 at long-term follow-up. Five of 11 had new or enlarged T2 MRI lesions without contrast enhancement.
What this means for people with MS
These are limited late-safety observations, not evidence that the intervention slowed disability or restored myelin. A lower gray-matter atrophy rate than in the first two years was an exploratory MRI observation. The small retrospective study had no concurrent randomized control, so it cannot show that the cells caused this difference or a benefit to patients. This remains an experimental intervention, not established treatment.
About the approach studied in this programme: STEMS (fetal neural precursor cells)
The cells were given once by lumbar puncture, with temporary immune suppression to reduce rejection. The proposed benefit is support for the nervous system and its own repair, not proven replacement of lost myelin in people.
Approach source: Stem Cell Research & Therapy — STEMS methods and rationale ↗
- What kind of evidence exists?
- Original report of 11 of 12 recipients, median 5.7 years after transplantation
- How reliable is this source?
- Peer-reviewed original study; 11 recipients from an open-label Phase 1, retrospective adverse-event collection, no control group, unequal external reference cohorts and exploratory analyses without multiple-comparison correction.
- Research event/source date
- Published by MyelinWatch
- Last substantive MyelinWatch update