What happened
Published on 24 September 2026, this Massachusetts General Hospital study examined 1,600 adults aged 55 years or older with multiple sclerosis (MS): 800 who received at least 600 mg of intravenous ocrelizumab and 800 who had never received a B-cell-depleting treatment. Using person-time and adjustment for measured group differences, the researchers found higher rates in the ocrelizumab group for infection-related hospitalization (incidence rate ratio 1.67; 95% confidence interval 1.15–2.43) and infections overall (1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.20–1.68).
What this means for people with MS
This safety signal can inform a discussion with a treating neurologist about individual infection risk and monitoring. It does not prove that ocrelizumab caused the difference or predict an individual's risk. The groups differed in age and follow-up (median 3.5 versus 8.2 years), and the retrospective records may capture infections differently because treatment recipients had more structured clinical contact. Treatment selection, missing disability data, and possible immortal-time bias also limit causal interpretation. This study does not test MS efficacy, support changing treatment without clinical review, or establish Greek availability or reimbursement.
- What kind of evidence exists?
- Peer-reviewed, single-center observational study of electronic health records; 800 ocrelizumab recipients and 800 adults never exposed to B-cell-depleting treatment
- How reliable is this source?
- The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, original peer-reviewed article (PMID 42834886; DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101640). Single-center retrospective evidence; investigator-initiated Genentech funding, with no funder role reported by the authors. Substantial missing disability measurements and possible selection, ascertainment, and immortal-time biases.
- Research event/source date
- Published by MyelinWatch
- Last substantive MyelinWatch update