What happened
A published analysis examined cerebrospinal-fluid samples from two groups of people with secondary or primary progressive MS: 50 participants in a Phase 2 study and 43 in an expanded-access programme. After repeated intrathecal autologous MSC-NP treatment, CCL2, MMP9, SCF and CHIT1 changed in cerebrospinal fluid. NfL and GFAP did not show the same pattern of change.
What this means for people with MS
These findings may help measure biological response and guide future study design. They do not show remyelination, improvement in symptoms or disability, or an established benefit to patients.
- What kind of evidence exists?
- Peer-reviewed biomarker analysis from two groups of people
- How reliable is this source?
- Strong for the biomarker analysis • peer-reviewed original paper with reported study identifiers